Iraqi Kurdistan and the War Between Iran and the Zionist Regime: An Analytical Review

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Political Science, Department of Security and Social Scenes, Policy Making Sciences and Social Studies Research institute,

Abstract

Iraqi Kurdistan has adopted an independent foreign policy from the Iraqi central government in the past two decades; This foreign policy is based on a different model and strategy that aims at independence. In this regard, considering the importance and determinant nature of Iran’s regional policy in the face of regional developments such as the disintegration of neighboring countries along with Tehran’s position on the independence of Iraqi Kurdistan, Erbil is leveraging a strategic model of balance of threat towards the confrontation between Tehran and Tel Aviv. Accordingly, the present study seeks to explain why and how this strategy is adopted by the Iraqi Kurdistan toward the confrontation between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Zionist regime. Therefore, the main question is "what is the rationale for Iraqi Kurdistan to understand the Iranian threat?" The hypothesis is that due to its historical components, different organizational and social identities, differences in power levels, and personal factors (mindsets of the leaders), Iraqi Kurdistan sees the Islamic Republic of Iran as an obstacle to the way of realization of its independence. Therefore, Iraqi Kurdistan in the Zionism-Iranian confrontation pursues a unique strategy based on the balance of threat. This essay is an analytical-explanatory study that has been done using a combination of theoretical frameworks of the balance of threat and constructivism. Furthermore, the research method in this essay is based on trend analysis.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Article Title [Persian]

Iraqi Kurdistan and the War Between Iran and the Zionist Regime: An Analytical Review

Author [Persian]

  • محمد رجبی
Abstract [Persian]

Iraqi Kurdistan has adopted an independent foreign policy from the Iraqi central government in the past two decades; This foreign policy is based on a different model and strategy that aims at independence. In this regard, considering the importance and determinant nature of Iran’s regional policy in the face of regional developments such as the disintegration of neighboring countries along with Tehran’s position on the independence of Iraqi Kurdistan, Erbil is leveraging a strategic model of balance of threat towards the confrontation between Tehran and Tel Aviv. Accordingly, the present study seeks to explain why and how this strategy is adopted by the Iraqi Kurdistan toward the confrontation between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Zionist regime. Therefore, the main question is "what is the rationale for Iraqi Kurdistan to understand the Iranian threat?" The hypothesis is that due to its historical components, different organizational and social identities, differences in power levels, and personal factors (mindsets of the leaders), Iraqi Kurdistan sees the Islamic Republic of Iran as an obstacle to the way of realization of its independence. Therefore, Iraqi Kurdistan in the Zionism-Iranian confrontation pursues a unique strategy based on the balance of threat. This essay is an analytical-explanatory study that has been done using a combination of theoretical frameworks of the balance of threat and constructivism. Furthermore, the research method in this essay is based on trend analysis.

Keywords [Persian]

  • Iran
  • Iraqi Kurdistan
  • Zionist regime
  • strategy
  • Balance of threat
  • #

    • (2014). Barzani: My plan is to change the Sykes-Picot agreement. https://worldbulletin.dunyabulteni.net/iraq/barzani-my-plan-is-to-change-the-sykes-picot-agreement-h151825.html.
    • Abdelhadi, M. (2006). Israelis `train Kurdish forces. BBC News, September 20, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/5364982.stm.
    • Adams Schmidt, D. (1974). The Kurdish Insurgency. Strategic Review, Vol. 2, No. 3 (Summer).
    • Al-Ansary, K. (2008). Talabani-Barak handshake angers some Iraqi MPs. Reuters (https://www.reuters.com/article/idUKL0432866020080704).
    • Amit, M. (2002). “Introduction” in The Iraqi-Israeli Confrontation: 1948-2000. Tel Aviv: Ministry of Defense, (ed. Shaul Shai) (In Hebrew).
    • Bar-Zohar, M., & Mishal, N. (2010). Mossad: The Greatest Missions of the Israeli Secret Service. New York: Harper Collins.
    • Baser, B., & Atlas, D. (2021). Once A Diaspora, Always A Diaspora? The Ethnic, Cultural and Political Mobilization of Kurdistani Jews in Israel. Politics, Religion & Ideology, Volume 22, 2021 - Issue 3-4, 302-328.
    • Bengio, O. (2012). The Kurds of Iraq: Building a State Within a State. Colorado, United States: Lynne Rienner Pub.
    • Bishku, M. (2018). Israel and the Kurds: A Pragmatic Relationship in Middle Eastern Politics. Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies Vol. 41, No. 2 (Winter), 52-72.
    • Column, G. (2019). Israeli Kurdophilia and the American 'Betrayal' of the Syrian Kurds. the UCLA Younes & Soraya Nazarian Center for Israel Studies (https://www.international.ucla.edu/israel/article/211984).
    • Ghasemi Heydari, M., Azhdari, B., & Majid, M. (2020). Kurdish Independence Aspirations and the Strategy of Israel and the United States to Weaken Iran's Territorial Integrity. The international studies journal (quarterly periodical), Volume 17, Issue 1 - Serial Number 65, 87-115.
    • Gibson, B. R. (2019). The Secret Origins of the U.S.-Kurdish Relationship Explain Today’s Disaster. Foreign Policy, October 14, https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/10/14/us-kurdish-relationship-history-syria-turkey-betrayal-kissinger/.
    • Gunter, M. (1992). Foreign Influences on the Kurdish Insurgency in Iraq. Journal of Conflict Studies, Vol. 12 No. 4, 7-25.
    • Khosravi, A., & Asadi, A. (2019). Iraqi Kurdish Push for Independence: Structural Analysis and Scenarios. Strategic Studies Quarterly, Volume 21, Issue 81 - Serial Number 3, December, 185-212 (In Persian).
    • Liga, A. (2017). The "Israel Factor" and the Iraqi-Kurdish Quest for Independence. Istituto Affari Internazionali, 1-5.
    • Gunter, M. (1992). The Kurds in Iraq: Tragedy and Hope. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    • Mercer, J. (1995). Anarchy and Identity. International Organization, Vol.49, No.2, 229-252.
    • Morris, J. (1980). Begin Airs Secret Israeli Aid to Kurds as Reminder for Iraqis. The Christian Science Monitor, 6 October, 11.
    • Mostafavi Ardebili, Seyed Mohsen; Daheshiar, Hossein; Ahmadi, Hamid; Haji Mineh, Rahmat. (2020). Kurds in Iraq & Syria in the aftermath of ISIS. Contemporary Political Investigations, Vol 10, Issue 4 - Serial Number 34. pp: 157-178. [In Persian]
    • Natali, D. (2005). The Kurds and the state: Evolving national identity in Iraq, Turkey, and Iran. Syracuse University Press.
    • Navon, E. (2020). The Star and the Scepter: A Diplomatic History of Israel Hardcover. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society.
    • Price, R., & Reus-Smit, C. (1998). Dangerous liaisons? Critical international theory and constructivism. Europeon Journal of Internatinal Relations Vol 4, No.3, 259-294.
    • Rajabi, Mohammad. (2019). The Position of Iraqi Kurdistan in Regional Policy of the United States of America in West Asia. Political Research in Islamic World, Vol 9, No. 2. pp: 27-53. [In Persian]
    • Rose, C. (2017). The precarious Kurdish-Israeli relationship, post-Kirkuk. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/menasource/the-precarious-kurdish-israeli-relationship-post-kirkuk/.
    • Salehi, H. (2015). Liberation of Shengal and the differences between Barzani and the PKK. http://kurdtoday.ir/news/10651/ (In Persian).
    • Walt, S. (1987). The Origins of Alliances. New York: Cornell University Press.
    • Walt, S. M. (2005). Taming American Power: The Global Response to US Primacy. New York: w.W. Norton.
    • Wendt, A. (1999). social theory, Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
    • Yazdanpanah Dero, Kimours; Kamran, Hassan; Ranjbari, Kamal. (2017). An Analysis of the Geopolitics of the Kurdish Region of Iraq After the Collapse of ISIS. Geography Journal, Vol 15, No. 53. pp: 37-54. [In Persian]
    • Zoghi, Iraj. (1988). Iran and the Great Powers in World War II: A Study of Imperialism. Tehran: Pazhang Publication. [In Persian]#